In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.
In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.
As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key. This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.
Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription.
Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).
Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!
- REVIEW OF BOOKS
Robert Kagan, "The twilight of the liberal world order"
Brookings - 25 Jan 2017
This is a long (more than 15 min), deep and pessimistic piece on the US new administration’s unwillingness to continue upholding the world order. Kagan argues that this new approach is likely “to hasten a return to the instability and clashes of previous eras. These external challenges to the liberal world order and the continuing weakness and fracturing of the liberal world from within are likely to feed on each other”.
Published in Weekly selection 27 January 2017
Jeffrey Frankel, "Who is President Trump?"
Project Syndicate - 11 Nov 2016
This article is inevitably biased, but we chose it among the flurry of post-Trump victory articles because it provides a simple framework to think about what President Trump might do and might not do. To put it simply: we are clueless. The Harvard professor and former member of Bill Clinton’s council of economic advisers explains why Trump’s stunning election victory has pushed the United States – and the world – into uncharted territory. The only relative certainty is that most of his fiscal proposals will be enacted, and will entail dramatic economic and investment consequences (some good some bad) (reads in 4-6 min).
Published in Weekly selection 11 November 2016
Joshua Mitchell, "Donald Trump Does Have Ideas—and We’d Better Pay Attention to Them"
Politico - 16 Sep 2016
The political scientist argues that the post-1989 world order is unraveling and that Trump has 6 ideas to replace it. They are swirling around us like “mental dust waiting to coalesce” and are a direct repudiation of the system of globalization and identity politics that has defined the world order since the Cold War. The 6 are: (1) borders matter; (2) immigration policy matters; (3) national interests, not so-called universal interests, matter; (4) entrepreneurship matters; (5) decentralization matters; (6) PC speech must be repudiated (reads in 12-16 min).
Published in Weekly selection 23 September 2016
- 23 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.