In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.

In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.

As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key.  This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.

Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription. 

Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!




Kenneth Rogoff
Filter: Category: SOCIETY > Globalization
  • ECONOMICS, SOCIETY, Globalization

    Dany Rodrik, "Don’t Cry Over Dead Trade Agreements"

    Project Syndicate - 8 Dec 2016

    While populist revolts of 2016 will put an end to all current major trade negotiations, the Harvard economist offers a subtle argument as to why we shouldn’t bemoan the passing of the era of trade agreements. Trade policies are often driven by special interests, with “beggar-thy-neighbor” consequences that reflect power asymmetries and political failures within societies. If we manage our own economies well, he says, new trade agreements will be largely redundant (reads in 5-7 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 9 December 2016

  • GEOPOLITICS, SOCIETY, Globalization,

    Ian Buruma, "The End of the Anglo-American Order"

    The New York Times Magazine - metered paywall - 10 Dec 2016

    This is a little gem from one of today’s great global thinkers.  Buruma wonders what the end of the US and Britain’s vision of democracy and freedom that defined the postwar world means and ponders what will happen in an age of Donald Trump and Nigel Farage. In his opinion, Brexit Britain and Trump’s America are linked in their desire to pull down the pillars of Pax Americana and European unification (reads in more than 10 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 9 December 2016

  • ECONOMICS, China, SOCIETY, Globalization

    Christopher Balding, "In Trump Versus China, Everyone Can Win"

    Bloomberg View - 22 Nov 2016

    This short piece (reads in 3-5 min) neatly delineates the likely contours of Trump’s economic / trade policy vis-à-vis China.  There is no need to levy counter-productive tariffs on Chinese goods; Trump can simply redress the asymmetry that China has with the US and the rest of the world by scrutinizing Chinese FDI more closely and slowly; pushing the acquisition targets to look elsewhere for buyers. A win-win would consist in China lowering its own barriers to foreign investment now.

    Published in Weekly selection 26 November 2016

  • 32 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.