In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.

In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.

As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key.  This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.

Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription. 

Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!


Search



Categories

Tags

Kenneth Rogoff
Filter: Category: GEOPOLITICS
  • ECONOMICS, Asia, GEOPOLITICS, Asia

    Chandran Nair, "After 50 years of progress, it's time for ASEAN's next economic revolution"

    World Economic Forum - 10 May 2017

    Emmanuel Macron’s victory in France will reignite interest in regional integration. In the Western world, we think of the EU, but in this short (5-6 min read) piece, the founder of the Global Institute for Tomorrow reminds us that there is another, larger regional union.  ASEAN constitutes a group of 10 member states with a combined GDP of $2.6 trillion (2014) and a population almost twice that of the EU, soon expected to reach about 800 million. The article neatly delineates ASEAN’s achievements and challenges.

    Published in Weekly selection 12 May 2017


  • ECONOMICS, Emerging Markets, Monetary Policy, GEOPOLITICS, New world order

    Stephen Roach, "A World Turned Inside Out"

    Project Syndicate - 26 Apr 2017

    The pendulum of world economic growth has swung dramatically from advanced countries to the emerging economies. It is a stunning development that raises at least three fundamental questions about our understanding of macroeconomics: (1) it’s time to rethink the role of monetary policy, (2) the developing world is now far less dependent on the global trade cycle and more reliant on internal demand, (3) China has played a disproportionate role in reshaping the world economy (reads in 5-7 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 29 April 2017


  • GEOPOLITICS, Conflicts, ECONOMICS

    Jeffrey Sachs, "Will Economic Illiteracy Trigger a Trade War?"

    Project Syndicate - 20 Apr 2017

    At a time when so much of the political discourse in the US (and elsewhere) focuses on trade deficits, this article does a great job at debunking the fallacy that protectionism is the solution. The current-account balance equals national savings minus domestic investment; so a deficit reflects the US own saving-investment imbalance, nothing more than that. The only way for the US to reduce its current-account deficit is either to save more or to invest less in its economy (reads in 6-8 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 21 April 2017


  • 242 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.