In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.

In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.

As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key.  This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.

Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription. 

Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!




Kenneth Rogoff
Filter: Category: ECONOMICS > Financial Markets
  • ECONOMICS, Eurozone, Financial Markets

    Leonid Bershidsky, "Shorting the Euro Is an Outdated Strategy"

    Bloomberg View - 16 Mar 2017

    For years we’ve expressed the conviction in the Monthly Barometer that the risks of a Eurozone disintegration are grossly overestimated by many prominent market participants (in the short and medium-term). This short article (reads in 4-5 min) does a good job at explaining why going short the € is likely to fail.

    Published in Weekly selection 17 March 2017

  • ECONOMICS, Financial Markets, US

    Julie Verhage, "Goldman Sachs Economists Are Starting to Worry About President Trump"

    Bloomberg - 6 Feb 2017

    Nothing new here, but when the warning comes from one of the top US investment banks a top executive of which just joined the Trump team, surely it is a sign that disruption is coming. The three concerns: (1) Obamacare struggle is a sign of things to come: a fiscal boost, if it happens, is mostly a 2018 story; (2) Polarization of political parties is getting worse; (3) There's a real possibility of market disruption because of Trump's focus on immigration and trade (reads in 3-4 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 10 February 2017

  • ECONOMICS, Financial Markets, Financial sector

    Timothy Geithner, "Are we Safe Yet? How to Manage Financial Crises?"

    Foreign Affairs (metered paywall) - 1 Feb 2017

    This is a longish (reads in more than 15 min), in-depth and thoughtful article from the “ultimate insider” – the person who was in charge of the US Treasury during the great financial crisis. Assessing whether the financial system is safer today requires that we assess: (1) the underlying fragility of the system; (2) the ability to limit the intensity of a crisis; (3) what the other powers necessary to prevent a financial crisis from spiraling out of control can do. On these three counts, Geithner explains why he’s worried and what he would do.

    Published in Weekly selection 3 February 2017

  • 86 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.