In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.

In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.

As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key.  This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.

Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription. 

Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!




Kenneth Rogoff
Filter: Category: ECONOMICS > Employment/unemployment
  • ECONOMICS, Employment/unemployment, Technology, Internet

    John Herrman, "What Will Service Work Look Like Under Amazon?"

    The New York Times - metered paywall - 18 Jul 2017

    Amazon epitomizes what the service economy is all about, and what its future will be. It regards labor as a simple commodity and tends to focus on domination, not on providing any sort of abstract benefit to society outside the lowering of prices and the delivery of goods. It has never put forth a rosy vision of the future of service labor and most likely never will (reads in 5-7 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 21 July 2017

  • ECONOMICS, Employment/unemployment, PSYCHOLOGY, Wellbeing

    Livia Gershon, "The Future Is Emotional"

    AEON Magazine - 24 Jun 2017

    Across the economy, technology is edging human workers into more emotional territory, meaning that many of the most important jobs of the future will require soft skills or “emotional labour”, currently undervalued and underpaid but invaluable. A growing real-world demand for workers with empathy and a talent for making other people feel at ease requires a serious shift in perspective. It means moving away from our singular focus on academic performance as the only road to success (reads in 7-10 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 7 July 2017

  • ECONOMICS, Employment/unemployment, Inequalities, Technology, Innovation

    Kai-Fu Lee, "The Real Threat of Artificial Intelligence"

    The New York Times - metered paywall - 24 Jun 2017

    In the flurry of articles written daily about AI, this one stands out for its clarity and insights: it is a written by a venture capitalist who also happens to be the president of the Artificial Intelligence Institute. Long story short: AI will “decimate” many jobs, will increase inequalities globally and will overwhelmingly benefit China and the US to the detriment of everybody else. To conclude optimistically, Lee offers an intriguing idea (reads in 5-7 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 30 June 2017

  • 63 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.