In today’s hyper-connected world, analysis has become a mere commodity. Retrieving it – let alone information – is like drinking from a fire hydrant. For example, Googling “global economic growth" yields 61 million results; “Eurozone deflation”, 1 million; “tensions in south-east Asia”, 2 million, and so on... It should therefore come as no surprise that we get easily lost in this myriad of information and analysis.

In the face of analysis overload, it becomes invaluable to sift, select and frame the issues and opinions that matter. This is why The Monthly Barometer came up with a Weekly Selection of op-eds and articles. Each week, we select just five of them (out of hundreds that are sent to us by our network) that we frame in two or three sentences. These five pieces convey in a succinct and accessible manner the thinking of people whose opinions matter the most in a variety of macro fields: economics, geopolitics, society, environment, technology and psychology. They constitute a “formidable” shortcut to complex analysis by offering insights and snapshots that can be read in just a few minutes and are easy to digest. For those keen to make sense of today’s world, The Weekly Selections are a must-read. They constitute the best antidote to information and analysis overload.

As a new service, The Monthly Barometer is now offering to its subscribers, and a potentially much larger group, a curation of all The Weekly Selections. On any given macro issue, it will be possible to access the best thinking at the tap of key.  This service should therefore be of particular interest to researchers and students enabling them as it does to grasp with ease “who said what and when”.

Subscribers of the Monthly Barometer can access curated Weekly Selections as part of their subscription. 

Researchers and students who do not wish to subscribe to The Monthly Barometer can access them on a pay-as-you-wish basis. Please pay an amount that corresponds to the value you attach to the product. If you don’t want to pay, remember the following: “If something online is free, you are not the customer – you are the product” (Jonathan Zittrain, George Bemis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

Curation of weekly selections – A distillation of the opinions that count!


Search



Categories

Tags

Kenneth Rogoff
Filter: Category: ECONOMICS > China
  • ECONOMICS, China, US

    Kenneth Rogoff, "Why Trump Can’t Bully China"

    Project Syndicate - 9 Feb 2017

    The Harvard professor argues that turning his back on globalization is “utterly naïve” and why a possible trade war with China is as likely “to accelerate China’s economic and military development as it is to slow it down”. China has financial weapons, including trillions of dollars of US debt. Furthermore, a disruption of trade with China could lead to massive price increases in the low-cost stores on which many Americans rely (reads in 4-6 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 10 February 2017


  • ECONOMICS, China, GEOPOLITICS, China

    Chandran Nair, "Consumptionomics: China’s Dilemma on Moderate Prosperity"

    The Wall Street Journal - 23 Dec 2016

    The author of Consumptionomics offers his take on China’s future. He explains why China cannot go on as it is (without catastrophic consequences for humanity) and what China can change. Among other things the Chinese will have to implement draconian measures to protect the public good in the 21st century (reads in 4-5 min).

    Published in Weekly selection 6 January 2017


  • ECONOMICS, China, SOCIETY, Globalization

    Christopher Balding, "In Trump Versus China, Everyone Can Win"

    Bloomberg View - 22 Nov 2016

    This short piece (reads in 3-5 min) neatly delineates the likely contours of Trump’s economic / trade policy vis-à-vis China.  There is no need to levy counter-productive tariffs on Chinese goods; Trump can simply redress the asymmetry that China has with the US and the rest of the world by scrutinizing Chinese FDI more closely and slowly; pushing the acquisition targets to look elsewhere for buyers. A win-win would consist in China lowering its own barriers to foreign investment now.

    Published in Weekly selection 26 November 2016


  • 74 more articles, please Subscribe to access to all of them.